Probably written by a student of Aristotle, The Athenian Constitution is both a history and an analysis of Athens' political machinery between the seventh and fourth centuries BC, which stands as a model of democracy at a time when city-states lived under differing kinds of government. The writer recounts the major reforms of Solon, the rule of the tyrant Pisistratus and his so...(展开全部)

G.W.考克斯 英国著名历史学家，主要研究方向是世界古代史和中世纪史。他在欧美学术界有着巨大的影响力，曾受牛津大学、剑桥大学、哈佛大学等二十余所世界名校邀请，前往讲学，是19世纪中后期欧美讲学热潮的重要表现之一。他的代表作品有《希波战争》《十字军东征》。

G.W.考克斯 英国著名历史学家，主要研究方向是世界古代史和中世纪史。他在欧美学术界有着巨大的影响力，曾受牛津大学、剑桥大学、哈佛大学等二十余所世界名校邀请，前往讲学，是19世纪中后期欧美讲学热潮的重要表现之一。他的代表作品有《希波战争》《十字军东征》。

As everyone knows, the United States Constitution is a tangible, visible document. Many see it in fact as a sacred text, holding no meaning other than that which is clearly visible on the page. Yet as renowned legal scholar Laurence Tribe shows, what is not written in the Constitution plays a key role in its interpretation. Indeed some of the most contentious Constitutional deb...(展开全部)

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia once remarked that the theory of an evolving, "living" Constitution effectively "rendered the Constitution useless." He wanted a "dead Constitution," he joked, arguing it must be interpreted as the framers originally understood it. In The Living Constitution, leading constitutional scholar David Strauss forcefully argues against the claims o...(展开全部)

Constitutional law is clearly shaped by judicial actors. But who else contributes? Scholars in the past have recognized that the legislative branch plays a significant role in determining structural issues, such as separation of powers and federalism, but stopped there - claiming that only courts had the independence and expertise to safeguard individual and minority rights. In...(展开全部)

In this fascinating debunking of judicial supremacy, Devins and Fisher argue that nonjudicial contributions to constitutional interpretation make the Constitution more stable, more consistent with constitutional principles, and more protective of individual and minority rights. This highly readable narrative of how the Court and elected officials work in concert with the Americ...(展开全部)

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia once remarked that the theory of an evolving, "living" Constitution effectively "rendered the Constitution useless." He wanted a "dead Constitution," he joked, arguing it must be interpreted as the framers originally understood it. In The Living Constitution, leading constitutional scholar David Strauss forcefully argues against the claims o...(展开全部)

罗伯特·D. 库特（Robert D. Cooter），加州大学伯克利分校法学院 Herman F.Selvin 法律教席教授。曾任美国法律经济学会会长，在法学和经济学两个领域均著述颇丰。他与托马斯·尤伦合著的《法与经济学》被译成多种文字，是法律经济学领域的经典教材。 张小平，经济学学士，法学博士。中央财经大学法学院副教授，加州大学伯克利分校访问学者，美国佛罗里达大学访问学者。

In this fascinating debunking of judicial supremacy, Devins and Fisher argue that nonjudicial contributions to constitutional interpretation make the Constitution more stable, more consistent with constitutional principles, and more protective of individual and minority rights. This highly readable narrative of how the Court and elected officials work in concert with the Americ...(展开全部)